Purpose of This Scale
This page hosts a prototype assessment that examines meta‑cognition, the way we interpret events, recognise bias, apply context, and regulate our thinking. I’m gathering anonymous responses to test the structure of the scale and evaluate whether it functions as a valid component within the wider SESA-TDRAM-BEF governance methodology. Your participation helps refine a tool designed for ethical, reflective, and context‑aware decision‑making. Once the structure is established, I’ll also assess reliability (how consistently the scale performs) using standard psychometric methods.
How to Complete This Scale
Please read each statement and rate how true it feels for you in everyday situations. Use the scale below to choose the response that fits best:
1 - Strongly Disagree
2 - Disagree
3 - Neither Agree nor Disagree
4 - Agree
5 - Strongly Agree
There are no right or wrong answers. Please respond honestly based on your usual patterns, not how you think you “should” respond.
Consent & Data Use
By completing this scale, you are giving permission for your anonymous responses to be used for research and development of the SESA-TDRAM-BEF methodology. No identifying information is collected, and individual responses cannot be traced back to you. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. Your data will be used only for analysing the structure and performance of the scale.
Thank you for taking part.
Your responses contribute directly to the development and refinement of this scale and help strengthen the SESA–TDRAM–BEF methodology. Your time and insight genuinely make a difference.
The link to access MCPI is below: